Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling: Which One Should You Choose?

Is your website or application crashing during spikes in traffic because it just cannot handle the load? That is where you need to scale your servers, meaning your system needs to grow to cater to the increased demand. But how exactly do you scale? Do you add more power to your already existing machine (vertical scaling) or add more machines to share the load (horizontal scaling)? 

Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling

Here, we will break down horizontal scaling vs vertical scaling, helping you decide which one fits your needs while aligning with the budget. Let us roll down.

What Is Scaling in Cloud Hosting?

In cloud computing, scaling refers to the process of expanding a system’s capacity to handle an increase in demand. This could be due to more users, higher data throughput, or more complex processes. Two primary methods dominate the world of scaling:

  • Horizontal Scaling (Scale Out): Adding more machines or servers to distribute the load.
  • Vertical Scaling (Scale Up): Increasing the resources (CPU, RAM, storage) of an existing machine.

Both strategies have distinct benefits and challenges. Choosing the right approach depends on various factors, including cost, complexity, performance requirements, and long-term scalability goals.

Vertical Scaling: An In-Depth Overview

Vertical scaling is termed as “scaling up”, meaning adding more resources (such as CPU, RAM, or storage) to a single server or machine. The addition could be more CPU, RAM, storage, or networking. In most cases, this is usually the easiest approach to scale out a system because no application code change is required, however, scaling vertically does have its limits. The most obvious limitation is that there is a physical limit to how much you can scale a single machine. Besides, vertical scaling tends to be very expensive since one has to buy more powerful hardware.

Key Characteristics of Vertical Scaling:

  • Ease of Implementation: Fewer moving parts than horizontal scaling.
  • Cost Efficiency—up to a certain extent: You do not have to manage multiple servers, but there is a limit to how far you can scale.
  • Single Point of Failure: With an upgraded server, if the system goes down, it means your entire system will collapse.

Advantages of Vertical Scaling

Vertical scaling becomes the most efficient approach to businesses when you want to scale infrastructure. The main idea of vertical scaling is upgrading the existing hardware or virtual machines. This can provide a range of benefits for projects, especially those small to medium in size. Below, we delve into five key points that highlight the strengths of vertical scaling:

Simplicity & Ease of Management

Vertical scaling maintains a simple architecture as it only upgrades the existing hardware or VMs without leading to any complexity in network configurations and machines. Management and updating of the software are therefore easier, as well as backups, while everything is centralized in one place.

Cost-Effectiveness for Smaller Workloads

It is more cost-effective for small to medium-sized businesses and projects to add additional resources to their current server, as in most cases this is cheaper compared to the practice of maintaining more than one instance or server.

Performance & Lower Latency

Upgrading the power of CPUs or memory upgrades instantly results in performance gain, especially for applications that are computation-intensive. Working on a single machine reduces network latency, hence increasing the speed of processing.

No Complex Infrastructure Needed

By scaling vertically, it will not require load balancing, distributed storage, and complex network architecture. Vertical scaling is suitable for single-threaded applications that are not well-suited for distribution across multiple servers.

Horizontal Scaling: An In-Depth Overview

On the other side, horizontal scaling is about “scaling out,” which means adding more machines to a system. This spreads the work over more machines, making both performance and availability better. Horizontal scaling is more complex compared to vertical scaling since such scaling requires an alteration in the application code, however, it is more scalable for the very long term-future with the ability to add as many machines as one needs.

Key Characteristics of Horizontal Scaling:

  • Scalability: Scales the load with the addition of new servers.
  • Flexibility: Very well-suited for cloud environments and distributed systems.
  • Fault Tolerance: In case one server fails, others can fill in.

Advantages of Horizontal Scaling

Horizontal scaling offers numerous advantages when managing big applications with dynamic workloads. A few of the major benefits listed below indicate why horizontal scaling is necessary.

Better at Handling High Traffic Loads & Load Balancing

Horizontal scaling effectively manages sudden traffic spikes in load, efficiently scattering the workload across multiple nodes with possibly high availability and performance. Additionally, it enables efficient load balancing where no single server is overwhelmed.

Improved Reliability and Fault Tolerance

Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling

Horizontal scaling has built-in redundancy, meaning that if one server goes down, others can keep up with the work. This improves reliability and fault tolerance, reducing the overall risk of downtime, which is essential for critical applications.

More Flexibility and Scalability for Cloud Environments

This makes horizontal scaling very flexible, one can include or remove servers according to need without causing major disruption. Cloud platforms are designed to support such scalability, and it is quite easy to automate the scaling based on demand.

Cost-Effective in Large Applications

This is much more cost-effective when large applications scale out, as horizontal scaling can use lower-priced commodity hardware or cloud services rather than getting expensive, high-end hardware upgrades.

Geographical Distribution & Optimal Use of Resources

Horizontal scaling further allows resources to be geographically distributed, which reduces latency for users across the globe by serving them from a location closer to them. This also ensures better resource utilization, as every server operates within its optimal capacity for more efficient use of CPU, RAM, etc.

Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling: The Key Differences At a Glance

When it comes to scaling your application, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. As your project grows, you will need to decide between two major approaches to scaling: horizontal and vertical. So, which one should you choose? Let us take a look at a quick comparison between horizontal scaling vs vertical scaling and see how each approach could fit your needs.

AspectVertical Scaling (Scaling Up)Horizontal Scaling (Scaling Out)
DefinitionEnhancing the capacity of a single machine by adding resources like CPU, RAM, or storage.Adding more machines or nodes to a system to distribute the load and handle increased demand.
ArchitectureInvolves a single, more powerful machine.Involves multiple machines working together, often in a distributed system.
ImplementationGenerally simpler, involves upgrading existing hardware or moving to a more powerful machine.More complex, requires configuring multiple machines and ensuring they work together seamlessly.
DowntimeMay require downtime during upgrades.Can often be achieved with minimal or no downtime, as new nodes can be added without disrupting existing services.
Scalability LimitsLimited by the maximum capacity of a single machine, there is a ceiling to how much you can upgrade.Offers greater scalability, you can continue adding nodes as needed, making it more suitable for large-scale applications.
Fault ToleranceLower, the failure can lead to significant downtime since it is a single point of failure.Higher, as the failure of one node does not typically bring down the entire system, enhancing reliability.
Cost ConsiderationsInitially lowers costs, but can become expensive as you reach the upper limits of hardware upgrades.Higher initial costs, due to the need for multiple machines, but can be more cost-effective in the long run for large-scale systems.
PerformanceSuitable for applications with predictable, moderate growth, performance improves with hardware upgrades.Better suited for applications with high and unpredictable growth, can handle large numbers of concurrent requests efficiently.
Maintenance ComplexityLower as managing a single machine is straightforward.Higher as it is requires managing multiple machines, load balancing, and ensuring data consistency across nodes.
Use CasesIdeal for small to medium-sized applications, legacy systems, or when simplicity is a priority.Ideal for large-scale applications, web services with high traffic, and systems requiring high availability and fault tolerance.

Challenges of Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling

Both horizontal and vertical scaling come with their own set of challenges. It is important to be aware of these challenges so you can make an informed decision.

Horizontal Scaling Challenges

  • Complex Setup: Horizontal scaling is not very easy to set up. You have to configure the load balancers, monitor the health of multiple servers, and make sure your database is distributed correctly.
  • Data Consistency: It gets a little tricky sometimes to handle data consistency between multiple servers, especially if you keep a distributed database.
  • Cost Over Time: While horizontal scaling can be cost-effective for the long run, with more servers and infrastructure, there is quite an upfront cost.

Vertical Scaling Challenges

  • Hardware Limits: One server can get upgraded only so much. After that, you will reach the ceiling and will have to shift to horizontal scaling.
  • Single Point of Failure: Vertical scaling depends on one server, so when something goes wrong with that server, your whole application is down.
  • Downtime during Upgrade: The upgrade may involve downtime in your server, which may be a problem for those critical applications that need always-on conditions.

When Should You Choose Horizontal Scaling?

Most modern applications are using the default of horizontal scaling, which has to deal with high traffic and must be fault tolerant. With cloud providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, it is so easy to spin up new instances you can scale out all you want without concern for the underlying infrastructure. Horizontal scaling makes sense when:

  • High Traffic: If you foresee a high increase in the number of users, then horizontal scaling will let you add more servers to handle the increased load.
  • Fault Tolerance: Horizontal scaling provides redundancy. In case one server goes down, others can take over the work with no interruption.
  • Global Reach: When the applications serve users across the globe, horizontal scaling can be used to distribute traffic across regions for better response times.

When Should You Choose Vertical Scaling

Vertical scaling is preferable when the problem at hand is more about processing power rather than traffic volume. It is useful for smaller applications or situations where you need more horsepower without overhauling your infrastructure. This approach works when you are not expecting massive growth, and your workload can be handled by a more powerful server. Vertical scaling makes sense when:

  • Limited Growth: If you do not foresee huge spikes in traffic, you might be quite all right with just vertical scaling.
  • Simplicity: Scaling up is much easier compared to horizontal scaling, especially for small applications that do not need the complexity of managing a lot of servers.
  • Single-server Applications: Some applications do not rely on multiple servers, making vertical scaling a cost-effective solution.

Horizontal Scaling vs Vertical Scaling: Which Approach Fits Your Needs?

So, what do you think, which one is better, scaling up or scaling out? If you have a small to medium-sized app and are not expecting much traffic, scaling up might be simpler and more cost-effective in the short term. But if you anticipate high traffic or need more fault tolerance, scaling out is the way to go. It is more complex, but it delivers better performance and reliability over time. By assessing your system’s growth potential, complexity, and budget, you can choose the right scaling method to ensure long-term infrastructure success.

Stay with us for more insights and feel free to subscribe to our blog for valuable tutorials, guides, knowledge, and tips on web hosting and server management. You can also join our Facebook community to share insights and engage in discussions.

Join The Waitlist

To Get Early Access to Lifetime Deals

LTD WaitList Access